Articles by

You are currently browsing ’s articles.

Breaking Dawn Dominates (and I want to gush about it)

Breaking Dawn by Stephenie Meyer
(Little, Brown and Company/August 2008)
Alexandra Rae Valint

Vampires are cool again. Of course, to we steadfast lovers of the bloodsucking mythical creatures, vampires have always been cool: stealthy, seductive, and inexhaustible metaphors for sex, empire, death, and desire. However, vampires have not always been as sexy as they are now, and as they undeniably are in Stephenie Meyer’s cultishly popular Twilight Saga, the finale of which came out on August 2.

Edward Cullen, our vampire hero and star-crossed love of our human heroine, Bella Swan, is perfection: a chiseled, cold, god-like body paired with an enviable IQ. He’s a guy’s guy who plays baseball and loves fast cars, but he’s also the type of guy you bring home to your parents, who opens doors for you and lovingly records you a CD of songs he’s composed for you on his piano (which, by the way, he’s kind of a prodigy at). Oh, and he’s totally okay with just kissing. He’s inspired a legion of loyal fans who endlessly extoll his flawlessness. He’s nothing like Bram Stoker’s Dracula, who for all his manipulative magnetism always aroused equal amounts desire and repulsion. Neither was Dracula quite the same brooding, tortured type that the vampire has become in today’s fang-friendly pop culture. Buffy the Vampire Slayer’s resident vampire-with-a-soul, Angel, brooded with a stern, apprehensive face and morose eyes for three seasons before broodingly departing (at night, in shadow, without a word) to spin-off show Angel, where he brooded successfully for many more seasons. The recently aired (and cancelled) CBS series Moonlight starred another brooding vampire with a conscience who was, again, in love with a feisty blonde mortal. Such TV series have continued the trend towards the humanization and sexification of the vampire, along with the concomitant lessening of the danger and violence associated with the vampire’s demonic desires. Those sickly anemic looks, pointy fangs, and unwilling neck-scarred human victims have become stunning paleness, a set of perfect teeth, and a jug of extra blood from the hospital or leftover from the butcher’s shop. The vampire has increasingly become the repository for our hopes and anxieties about the human status as hero/victim: trapped within an everlasting yet bloodless and therefore blood-lusting body, the vampire struggles above his demon—his own self—to be “good,” “selfless,” and as “normal” as possible. The vampire has come to represent the human situation. Edward Cullen embodies this paradigm to the hilt, desperately trying to be good and moral in every way still open to him.

Clearly, there is nothing new about vampire lit. After Stoker and Polidori, Anne Rice, L.A. Banks, and Charlaine Harris’s Southern Vampire Mysteries (the basis for HBO’s fall series True Blood) followed. But no other vampire lit, to my knowledge, has caused this kind of frenzied, impassioned ferment. Witness: bookstores sponsor nationwide midnight release parties a la Harry Potter; a high school girl band, The Bella Cullen Project, gets their Twilight-inspired compositions distributed on iTunes (I recommend “Switzerland”); I’m up reading wide-eyed until 4 a.m., only to finally go to sleep and dream about the characters, only to wake up and write an acoustic-folk song with my sister (also a fan), only to then brag about said song to all my friends, who one-by-one I have converted to the series (my book conversion rate has never been higher).

To the still un-converted, the premise of the series is fairly simple: Bella Swan, our narrator, moves to Forks, a sleepy, rainy city in Washington State. Her first day at school, as she gazes across the abyss of the cafeteria, she locks eyes with a handsome pale boy sitting with other beautiful pale people (his adopted vampire family). Indescribable attraction and inevitable love ensue, even when she discovers he’s a vampire and even after he confesses that he must restrain himself from biting her because her blood is pretty much the best smelling liquid in the beverage store. Various threats to their love/life occur in the first three books, and through it all Bella desperately yearns to be turned into a vampire so she can live with Edward for ever and ever. The arrival of the fourth and final book in the series, Breaking Dawn, had the Twilight universe atwitter. Would Bella go through with the wedding? Would she become a vampire? Would Jacob (Bella’s best friend and a werewolf) imprint? Would Bella and Edward have sex? When August 2 arrived, and I cracked open the hefty hardback, I nearly read the 754 pages in one sitting.

Twists and surprises and answers to the aforementioned pressing questions make it almost impossible to talk about the book beyond page 25. However, from my investigation into the massive online response, Breaking Dawn has been met with more resistance and less unconditional glee than the previous three books received. Of course, a beloved series’ final book will never be met with hugs and kisses from everyone, and the book does take a distinct turn in subject matter, narrative structure, tone, and mood. The book feels more adult and less young adult, and perhaps that’s why some of the young fan base feels a bit alienated and betrayed. The book is no longer concerned with proving Edward and Bella’s love, but rather with handling the crises that come after love is assured. Such a maturation was to be expected; Bella leaves high school and parents behind, and she ventures into the unknown terrains of marriage and vampire existence (comically, the first causes her much more dread than the second). Even Meyer’s oftentimes inflated, indulgent prose feels more controlled, descriptively tighter here; she spends less time, though still a lot of time, expressing mushy love and describing steamy kisses and instead takes both the mushiness and steaminess of Edward and Bella’s relationship for granted (although the cold planes of Edward’s chest still receive an undue amount of attention).

Meyer is writing a different kind of book in Breaking Dawn: not girl gets boy, or girl gets boy back, or girl gets stuck in a classic love triangle. Breaking Dawn’s winding plot is harder to stereotype as frothy teen fantasy romance when it’s mostly preoccupied with the reasons we form the families we do and the ways we keep them from disintegrating. Thematically, the books have always emphasized choice and sacrifice (ironically within a framework of destiny), but yet again, such topics have matured and broadened in this final book. Breaking Dawn’s climactic showdown, a more psychological and nuanced battle than the one in Eclipse, features relevant questions about power, war, corruption, and the necessity of resisting the politics of fear.

I have spent a lot of time wondering why these books are so gosh-darn popular. Certainly, there is the refreshing, yet endearingly sexy, abstinence of Bella and Edward and the drug and alcohol free high school scene, both which makes the world of Gossip Girl a drunken and stoned red-light district by comparison. Of course, there is the grand, love-at-first-sight, fated passion between Bella and Edward, a soul mate scenario which invokes Juliet and Romeo and Cathy and Heathcliff (Bella and Edward actually quote from Wuthering Heights to express their mutual infatuation). But, I think, at the heart of readers’ intense investment in the series is that Bella, a seemingly ordinary girl who doesn’t fit in in “this world,” whose life in “this world” is defined by mind-numbing mediocrity, has another viable option; she has an escape.

And here is the core fantasy behind the series: not that an average looking girl instantaneously mesmerizes a beautiful and brilliant supernatural being (although that is another fantasy), but that she possesses something special and inherent that makes her belong more to that other world, the glamorous supernatural realm, than to this mundane world of cafeteria lunches and graduation thank you cards. Of course, when Bella bemoans her life of mediocrity she also reveals her own, distinctly not-average strengths: her incredible bravery, loyalty, and ability to notice that an important letter is written, crucially, on a page torn from her copy of The Merchant of Venice. Despite her clumsiness and her human need for food and sleep, she’s always possessed a “superpower.” Although Edward’s superpower is the ability to read everyone’s mind, Bella’s mind has consistently been a closed book to him (it aggravates him; delights her). Bella’s mind is a fortress of sorts, defended by steely resolve and a wry individualism. Breaking Dawn satisfyingly follows this potential in ways that, again, I can do no more than hint at. Bella’s mind becomes her ultimate strength and her ultimate gift—a capitulation proving that an intelligent girl is always already a superhero.

Saturday Night Live returned to its live status this past Saturday night, hosted by 30-Rock writer/actress/producer extraordinaire Tina Fey. There was humor. There was glee. There was a deliciously self-mocking Huckabee (but, really, if it’s not mathematically possible for him to win…). But the most worthy skit riffed on Oscar-nominated films by way of commenting on the ridiculous yet innate power (and problems) of metaphor. The last 15 minutes of There Will Be Blood showcase the showdown between false prophet Eli and oilman Daniel Plainview—this bowling-alley set allegorical battle between religion and capitalism, between greed-motivated Eli and Daniel, relies linguistically on Daniel’s drunken “milkshake” metaphor. It’s both strange and strikingly perfect (as is Daniel’s weapon of choice). SNL’s skit imagines Daniel as hosting a show on the Food Network called “I Drink Your Milkshake” that features a milkshake-loving Daniel traversing the country in search of the holy grail of milkshakes along with his son and partner HW. Read the rest of this entry »

headless has closed

Thanks to everyone who sent us work for the Headless issue. We are no longer accepting submissions.

But the time of Headless approaches: it will launch, right here, October 29.

We are now accepting submissions for our second issue, which will go live in October 2007. The issue will be themed, because we’re cool like that. You may be asking, with the anticipation of a 13-year-old going to his first dance in wrinkled khakis and a boutonnière, what theme? What theme?

Headless.

Please send us your poetry, fiction, creative nonfiction, and cultural criticism on the theme of headless. Horsemen, flat beer, chocolate bunnies, the guy who never gets a blowjob, zombies, animal crackers, classical statues, John Wayne Bobbitt, groups without leaders, blondes, Marie Antoinette and other unfortunate royalty, Medusa post-Perseus, the philosophy of D.E. Harding — any and all of these could fall under the heading of headless. Whatever your interpretation, be sure to stun us. We’ll know it’s good when we feel, to paraphrase Emily Dickinson, as if the tops of our heads were taken off.

A belated roundup

It’s better to get rejected by the best than not to have tried: Gabriel Garcia Marquez tells young reporter, “If I give an interview to you I have to give an interview to everyone.” (via)

Here’s a way to get some love: storysouth’s Million Writers Award is now accepting nominations. Readers & writers can nominate any story published online in 2006.

Inside literary magazines: a few notes from a panel last night in San Francisco, which included editors of Zyzzyva and McSweeney’s.

Got $1,000 burning a hole in your pocket? Why no go to the Gettysburg Review Conference for Writers, June 6-11?

Front Porch 2.0: Barry Hannah! Video of Denis Johnson!

A Public Space #3 is out. But wait, I’m still enjoying #2!

New reviews up at January Magazine of T. Jefferson Parker’s Storm Runners, Don Hannah’s Ragged Islands and Catherine Jinks’ Elysium.

Are agents necessary? Identity Theory says maybe not, but then again, maybe so.

AWP is almost here

Last year, before I was in an MFA program, I happened to be in Austin while AWP was taking place. I snuck into a couple panels and crashed a party where Neal Pollack sang with his band (this was punk-rock Pollack, not alternadad Pollack). It all made me think AWP was a very cool conference, and I dreamed of going.

Now AWP is hardly more than a week away and I get to go for reals. The panels look great. I’ll also be trying to find magazines like Hobart and Pindeldyboz and Small Spiral Notebook on the floor. And like all conferences, there are the parties. The Emerging Writers Network is calling for an informal get-together early Thursday at the Mariott’s sports bar and Post Road is having a party Friday at the Mark Ultra Lounge.

See you at AWP!

Take the L Train

The L Magazine, a sassy New York bi-weekly, has announced their second annual Literary Upstart contest. 1,500 words, due April 12; if you just can’t decide which of your stories to submit, don’t sweat it — you can send in two. The finalists — which last year included Pittsburgh MFA student Sarah Harris, at left — read together in a watering hole somewhere in New York City during the summer to face off for a cash prize and adulation of the many.

(photo by Nicky Digital)

The Nelson Algren Awards for short fiction are open for just 3 more days. Run by the Chicago Tribune, the top prize is a luscious $5,000 — quite a purse for a previously unpublished story. Runners-up get “only” $1,500. They want 2,500-8,000 words, and they want it by mail, and they want it postmarked by Thursday. Don’t say we didn’t warn you.

This morning, in town for a speaking engagement at the Carnegie Library, Michael Chabon and Ayelet Waldman sat down with Pitt’s fiction students. As all Pitt writing students know, Chabon did his undergrad at the University of Pittsburgh. Chuck Kinder, the author who runs the Pitt creative writing program, said of Chabon, “I gave him special permission to sit in on graduate classes because he was clearly one of the most brilliant young writers I’ve ever been around.” That’s Michael Chabon on the left, Chuck Kinder on the right.

Sadly, I didn’t get a photo of Ayelet Waldman, who shared the stage — er, table — with her husband as they answered questions and shared stories about writing. Some of what they told us, hastily transcribed:

Chabon: What a good writing program does is give you time to do your writing. A writing program ought to be a way to change your life so you have more time for writing.

Q: Some undergrads are worried that if they’re not published by 23, they won’t really be writers…
Waldman: I think Michael’s one of the only people in the world who isn’t embarrassed by the book he published at 23.
Chabon: Oh, I’m embarrassed.

Chabon: If you write every day, you’re a writer.
Waldman: Michael’s model has been sufficient guilt to keep me at my desk.

Q: What’s the best writing advice you’ve ever gotten?
Chabon: Dennis Bartel, a teacher I had here: If you want to write a novel, you have to sit on your ass. At the time, I was like, Yeah, whatever, dude.
Waldman: story about the Golem as novel, a creature that you create but that you can’t necessarily control, ending with: It’s not anything good unless there’s a certain element of danger to it.

Q: What’s it like working in film, like Spiderman 2?
Chabon: It’s a totally different thing. so much goes unmade; he’s written 2 original screenplays, 2 pilots, years, 15 drafts of Kavalier and Clay. It’s not very fulfilling…. Usually the first draft is fun … but you don’t become a writer because you like sharing.

Q: What kind of research/prep did you do for The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay?
Chabon: Part of the reason I wanted to do that book was because of the research; I knew there was a lot I didn’t know (so he read a lot of old comic books, 50-year-old copies of Life magazine and interviewed Stan Lee, Will Eisner, Gil Kane.) My dad grew up in Brooklyn in the ’40s and ’50s and infected me with the sense of wonder of the time.

Q: How do you create the internal logic of Kavalier & Clay, in which superhuman feats appear naturalistic?
Chabon: Try to find books that give you permission to do the kind of work you want to do: E.L. Doctorow’s Ragtime, Gabriel Garcia Marquez’ Love in the Time of Cholera.

Q: Literary fiction vs. genre fiction?
Waldman: I started with murder mysteries. Who did I think I was? I was just a lawyer on maternity leave. My goal was to write something no worse than anything I’d ever read. I didn’t call myself a writer until I had 4 or 5 books published.
Chabon: When I was here, writing, the work that I did, the stories I wrote and the stuff that I wanted to do when I grew up was strongly influenced by what I read — science fiction, hardboiled detective novels. There had to be a way to write within genre and transcend genre — to write literary fiction true to its genre roots. The Mysteries of Pittsburgh was an anomole, naturalistic. All of my primordial great reading experiences were genre, in one way or another, starting with Arthur Conan Doyle when I was 10.

Michael Chabon’s upcoming novel, The Yiddish Policeman’s Union, is due out May 1. Ayelet Waldman’s latest, Love and Other Impossible Pursuits, is now out in paperback. Big thanks to them for spending time with us Pittsburgh fictioneers!

It is hard, while in grad school, to keep up with all the writing and reading, even though that is what we’re here to do. Each time a New York Review of Books arrives, I get a few pages into it, sigh, then return to reading about the culture wars of the academy in the 1990s or whatnot. And so it goes with all the periodcals: they crash through the mail slot, demanding attention, but more often than not end up shoved into the magazine rack. At which point I think, geez, I need a bigger magazine rack.

All of which is to say that in the latest New Yorker there is a new short story by David Foster Wallace*. Available online now, and on a magazine rack in my living room for the forseeable future.

*Which, amazingly, actually works in the line “What would even Jesus do,” without irony.**

** I think it’s without irony, that is.

How long should it take a journal get back to people who’ve sent in submissions? Bookfox looks at his experiences and find Zoetrope — with a response time of 369 days — wanting. Here’s his tally:

I’ll have a tiny journal like Apple Valley Review reject my short shorts in less than a week, while a heavy hitter like Columbia Journal still hasn’t responded to a story I mailed out in January 2006 (and neither have they responded to email queries, and my last short story I sent them took a year and a half to receive a reply). On the other hand, Glimmer Train is practically a model for speed. Zyzzyva is another one that has been prompt, and as a plus, Howard Junker’s rejection slip is the nicest I’ve ever read. Kenyon Review and One-Story have both been pretty quick. I’ve had multiple relative die while waiting to hear back from The Chattahoochee Review (and still have an outstanding story. . .) and Notre Dame Review clocked in at a snail pace of 8 months and 9 months for two separate submissions.

So what’s the problem? Is it the volume of entries? The fact that once an issue’s stories are selected, editorial staff just want to move on?

Rest assured, you can submit to Hot Metal Bridge and you’ll hear back before any of your relatives die.

Call for entries

Greetings and salutations! Hot Metal Bridge’s debut issue is looking for unpublished work right now. Poetry? Nonfiction? Fiction? Yes indeedy. Check out our call for entries and send us your stuff.

We are Hot Metal Bridge

We believe the most fun you can have by yourself is reading. That’s why Hot Metal Bridge is dedicated to writing that makes you go yowsa! or eek! or oof! We, the University of Pittsburgh MFA students behind Hot Metal Bridge, settle for nothing less than being a regular source of uncommonly good writing. It’s good for us — and it’s good for you.